I do believe that Karen Blixen’s actions are intended to be quite compassionate and genuine. She is actively involved with all of the people of Nairobi that live on her farm. She sets up English lessons to be taught to adults and Children in the evenings (even though this action could also be seen as egocentric, implying that the English language is more valuable than Swahili or other local dialects of the region) and provides medical care to anyone in need of it each morning. She even establishes close bonds with some of her neighbors. She treats a young Kikuyu boy named Kamante and establishes a relationship with him, ultimately making him her chef and teaches him how to cook traditional European dishes. Blixen also forms a friendship with one of her servants by the name of Farah. These actions suggest that she is immersing herself with her Nairobi neighbors and treating them very humanely (something not seen at all in the African slave trade). Yet both of the relationships that I addressed exemplify the power and superiority that remains in her and the subtle devaluing of the culture that originally inhabited that land.
Blixen’s enormous, lavish house serves as a constant reminder to the viewer of her wealth and privilege. Yes, she helps the native people of Nairobi often, but her indirect actions also make it clear that her way of living is drastically better than that of her neighbors.
As i look and view both pictures it is noticable how throughout the movie Karen is one way towards Africa itself and the people there. In the beginning of the film she doesnt really show to much interest in the actual continent, but with what is going on around pertaining to her. As the film goes deeper we see her establish relationships with the Africans and embraces them. As stated in your post she shows genuine compassion which flips the scrpit of how the movie is viewed now. Overall it was a good film and your post elaborates on situations that are viewable from observers
ReplyDeleteI totally agree with you, that there's a constant possible air of superiority. I always can't help but maybe think that (medically) the Europeans were more advanced, so she really was just helping Kamante. The house is a huge symbol of European power, especially in comparison to the homes that the workers live in.
ReplyDeleteI also found her lavish, fully furnished house ethnocentric.Her and her company aslo ate full meals at a table, adorned with all the trappings of a European neal. She even teaches her cook to a strictly European menu. There is even a part when Felicity, rides to her house for high tea, condifing that her parents were afraid her enlongated stay in Africa had made her "wild" and no man would ask her hand as a result. This exemplifys colonial European attitude of Africa, as an exotic land in which if they did not cling to every white tradition they arrived with, they would be ruined.
ReplyDeleteThis truly sheds light on how even the best intentions of bringing attention to Africa may not be fully successful in eradicating our ethnocentricity.
ReplyDelete